This proposed voting process is conceptual. Political disagreement on this process will most probably occur to the point of making such a process difficult to enact and install. However, the process itself must be defined with explanation so it can be shown with transparency.
There are several factors defining the voting process. However, the one defining factor which must be adhered to is the absolute, unambiguous control of the entire process. This includes securing all manners of voting, integrating everything into a fully auditable, fully transparent method which cannot be misinterpreted or, more likely, criminally alterable.
It is sad that many people in this country view the tightening of voter controls as a violation of civil rights. This is precisely the reason in how the current system is not only broken but has led to an unfortunate situation where voter fraud is not only possible, but likely, given circumstances that heretofore have required institutional trust and cooperation between all actors. One major national party, with cooperation from non-political entities such as Internet tech giants, classical (mainstream) news media, entertainment media, academia, and a variety of anti-democratic groups have blatantly stolen elections with no recourse left to those who want to see fair, democratic outcomes in a Constitutional republic.
To that end, a voting process framework must perform a variety of vital functions that would pragmatically guarantee the votes of all qualified voters are valid, while ensuring that unqualified voters are not able to influence the outcome. In addition, the ability to present the results in a timely manner for (fair) media outlets to report highly accurate (but unofficial) results is another major requirement of this process. Finally, the most important requirement is to give the voter confidence that his vote was cast as to his actual selection, while knowing that no other fraudulent votes were injected to compromise the legal votes.
While the voting process includes all elements of voting, from voter registration, precinct voting identifiers, transmission of results, and chain of custody for official ballots, each function of the process will be defined in its own module. Important data definitions will be introduced in each explanation of the process as they occur through their modules. Again, many of the elements described automatically are repelled by the major national party, but without those elements, the voter process will remain inherently worthless, which is what the party wishes to maintain.
This proposed voting process is conceptual. Political disagreement on this process will most probably occur to the point of making such a process difficult to enact and install. However, the process itself must be defined with explanation so it can be shown with transparency.
There are several factors defining the voting process. However, the one defining factor which must be adhered to is the absolute, unambiguous control of the entire process. This includes securing all manners of voting, integrating everything into a fully auditable, fully transparent method which cannot be misinterpreted or, more likely, criminally alterable.
It is sad that many people in this country view the tightening of voter controls as a violation of civil rights. This is precisely the reason in how the current system is not only broken but has led to an unfortunate situation where voter fraud is not only possible, but likely, given circumstances that heretofore have required institutional trust and cooperation between all actors. One major national party, with cooperation from non-political entities such as Internet tech giants, classical (mainstream) news media, entertainment media, academia, and a variety of anti-democratic groups have blatantly stolen elections with no recourse left to those who want to see fair, democratic outcomes in a Constitutional republic.
To that end, a voting process framework must perform a variety of vital functions that would pragmatically guarantee the votes of all qualified voters are valid, while ensuring that unqualified voters are not able to influence the outcome. In addition, the ability to present the results in a timely manner for (fair) media outlets to report highly accurate (but unofficial) results is another major requirement of this process. Finally, the most important requirement is to give the voter confidence that his vote was cast as to his actual selection, while knowing that no other fraudulent votes were injected to compromise the legal votes.
While the voting process includes all elements of voting, from voter registration, precinct voting identifiers, transmission of results, and chain of custody for official ballots, each function of the process will be defined in its own module. Important data definitions will be introduced in each explanation of the process as they occur through their modules. Again, many of the elements described automatically are repelled by the major national party, but without those elements, the voter process will remain inherently worthless, which is what the party wishes to maintain.